Home › Device types › GAT
Suture, Nonabsorbable, Synthetic, Polyethylene
FDA product code GAT · Class 2 · General, Plastic Surgery
9,356
Registered devices
20,678
Adverse events
23
Recalls
176
510(k) clearances
Devices with this code
HS-FIBER — RIVERPOINT MEDICAL, LLCHS Fiber — RIVERPOINT MEDICAL, LLCCARDIOXYL ® — PETERS SURGICALAnchorKnot Suture — Baylis Médicale Cie IncETHIBOND EXCEL — ETHICON, LLCDagrofil — B BRAUN SURGICAL SAFlexiGRAFT® — LIFENET HEALTHETHIBOND EXCEL — ETHICON, LLCDEKNATEL — TELEFLEX INCORPORATEDPremicron — B BRAUN SURGICAL SAFlexiGRAFT® — LIFENET HEALTHDagrofil — B BRAUN SURGICAL SAArthrex® — ARTHREX, INC.Premicron — B BRAUN SURGICAL SAETHIBOND EXCEL — ETHICON, LLCFlexiGRAFT® — LIFENET HEALTHDEKNATEL — TELEFLEX INCORPORATEDDEKNATEL — TELEFLEX INCORPORATEDETHIBOND EXCEL — ETHICON, LLCMaxBraid PE Suture — RIVERPOINT MEDICAL, LLCNovafil — Covidien LPApeCord — RIVERPOINT MEDICAL, LLCHS-FIBER — RIVERPOINT MEDICAL, LLCETHIBOND EXCEL — ETHICON, LLC
Recent recalls
| Date | Firm | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-02 | Covidien, LP | Sterile Barrier Breach of Breather Pouch may cause infection or vision loss for ophthalmic procedures in cases where there is direct patient contact |
| 2022-12-02 | Covidien, LP | Sterile Barrier Breach of Breather Pouch may cause infection or vision loss for ophthalmic procedures in cases where there is direct patient contact |
| 2022-12-02 | Covidien, LP | Sterile Barrier Breach of Breather Pouch may cause infection or vision loss for ophthalmic procedures in cases where there is direct patient contact |
| 2022-12-02 | Covidien, LP | Sterile Barrier Breach of Breather Pouch may cause infection or vision loss for ophthalmic procedures in cases where there is direct patient contact |
| 2019-08-15 | Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Inc. | Measurement listed on the label is not taken under tension, and this would cause possible extension of surgical time needed to complete the procedure. |
| 2019-02-21 | ArthroCare Corporation | The voluntary recall is being initiated due to a manufacturing error resulting in incorrect upper jaw dimensions, and the upper jaw could potentially disengage |
| 2015-04-30 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Sterility of device maybe compromised |
| 2014-06-25 | Peters Surgical | A potential splitting of the surface treatment of the thread ends on certain sutures has recently been identified. |
| 2014-06-25 | Peters Surgical | A potential splitting of the surface treatment of the thread ends on certain sutures has recently been identified. |
| 2014-03-11 | Teleflex Medical | The products are being recalled because they did not meet minimum needle attachment strength requirements. |
Query this across every FDA database — by API.
Linked GUDID · 510(k)/PMA · MAUDE · recalls · establishments. Free tier, no card required.
Get your free API keyRead the docsSourced from public U.S. FDA data. Informational only — not medical or regulatory advice. Not affiliated with the FDA.